Reserve Bank of Australia Minutes comparison — 17 March 2026 vs 11 August 2026

This Reserve Bank of Australia minutes comparison covers 17 March 2026 and 11 August 2026. Overall, the newer document was more dovish. The central bank has pivoted from an active hiking cycle to a holding pattern, with the decision shifting from a split 5-4 hike to a unanimous hold. The hold is explicitly conditional on inflation progress, and the statement retains a hawkish bias with several members seeing a real chance of further tightening, so the next move will depend on incoming data with a higher bar for cuts.

What changed

More dovish. The central bank has pivoted from an active hiking cycle to a holding pattern, with the decision shifting from a split 5-4 hike to a unanimous hold. The hold is explicitly conditional on inflation progress, and the statement retains a hawkish bias with several members seeing a real chance of further tightening, so the next move will depend on incoming data with a higher bar for cuts.

Inflation — Little changed. Inflation rhetoric remains firmly hawkish in both documents — both emphasise inflation above target and upside risks, with no material escalation or de-escalation in the assessment.
Labour Market — More dovish. Labour market rhetoric softened — prior described conditions as tighter than expected, while current notes conditions eased more than expected and spare capacity is projected to emerge from late 2027.
Rate Path — More dovish. Rate path shifted from a hike (5-4) with explicit near-term tightening guidance to a unanimous hold that removes the immediate tightening bias, though it retains a conditional hawkish stance.
Balance Sheet — Little changed. The balance of risks remains skewed to the upside for inflation in both documents, with no material shift in the overall risk assessment.

Key wording

17 March 2026

Members discussed why markets did not expect most central banks to look through the supply shock emanating from the conflict. They noted that this was more difficult to do when the shock was expected to be large and inflation had been above target for some time (as was the case in many economies).
rate path: Central banks unlikely to ignore supply shock, reinforcing rate hike expectations.

Market-implied measures of longer term inflation expectations were still well anchored in most countries, including in Australia, as markets expected central banks to adjust monetary policy as required.
inflation: Long-term inflation expectations anchored, but markets expect hawkish policy to maintain credibility.

While financial conditions had tightened in prior months, and particularly since the start of the current conflict in the Middle East, incoming data continued to suggest that this had occurred from a less restrictive position in the second half of 2025 than previously assessed. Accordingly, the extent to which overall financial conditions were restrictive at that time remained a matter of some uncertainty.
rate path: Uncertainty about restrictiveness leaves room for further tightening.

Market pricing indicated a 70 per cent probability of a 25 basis point rate increase at the current meeting and a greater than 100 per cent probability of a rate rise by May, with a further increase fully priced by August.
rate path: High market-implied probability of near-term rate hikes signals tightening bias.

Members noted that the economic data received since the previous meeting had, on balance, been broadly aligned with the forecasts in the February Statement on Monetary Policy , but that their composition pointed to slightly higher domestic capacity pressures than previously assessed.
rate path: Suggests underlying demand pressures are building, reinforcing case for tight policy.

In particular, labour market conditions were judged to be slightly tighter than expected and, consistent with that, model-based estimates of the output gap – which had already indicated excess demand – had been revised slightly higher.
labour market: Labour market tighter than expected adds to wage pressure and supports further tightening bias.

11 August 2026

Members noted that financial conditions in Australia had tightened in response to three increases in the cash rate in 2026 and were now judged by the staff to be somewhat restrictive.
rate path: Staff judgment of restrictive conditions signals board likely to hold rates steady, limiting near-term tightening odds.

Measures of longer term inflation compensation in Australia were still consistent with the inflation target.
inflation: Anchored long-term inflation expectations give the RBA room to keep policy on hold without risking de-anchoring.

The current cash rate target was at the top of the range of model- and market-based central estimates of the nominal neutral rate.
rate path: Cash rate at top of neutral range suggests policy is no longer stimulus-like, reducing urgency for further hikes.

Pricing implied that market participants saw little prospect of an increase in the cash rate target in August and around half a chance of a further 25 basis point increase by the end of 2026.
rate path: Market pricing implies a high probability of a pause in August, aligning with consensus for a hold.

Most market economists expected no further increase in the cash rate target, though a small number still expected another increase would be needed to stem persistent domestic inflation pressures.
rate path: The minority expecting another hike highlights upside inflation risk that could force a resumption of tightening if data disappoints.

In the labour market, conditions had eased by a little more over preceding months than had been expected. However, the unemployment rate remained low and conditions were still considered a little tight.
labour market: Labour market is softening but still tight, offering little clarity on the near-term policy path.

Official documents

Background reading

Earlier meeting · Later meeting · Previous comparison · Next comparison · Methodology