Bank of Japan Press conference comparison — 19 March 2026 vs 28 April 2026
This Bank of Japan press conference comparison covers 19 March 2026 and 28 April 2026. Overall, the newer document was more hawkish. The Bank of Japan held rates at 0.75% again but the tone has turned decisively more hawkish: inflation is now projected above 2% for fiscal 2026, upside price risks are flagged as dominant, and the guidance no longer ties future hikes to economic improvement. With dissents rising from one to three and a formal motion for 1.0%, the April meeting looks like a pause in an ongoing tightening cycle rather than a neutral hold,…
What changed
More hawkish. The Bank of Japan held rates at 0.75% again but the tone has turned decisively more hawkish: inflation is now projected above 2% for fiscal 2026, upside price risks are flagged as dominant, and the guidance no longer ties future hikes to economic improvement. With dissents rising from one to three and a formal motion for 1.0%, the April meeting looks like a pause in an ongoing tightening cycle rather than a neutral hold, keeping the next meeting live for a hike if inflation data confirm the upside risk.
- Inflation — More hawkish. The inflation narrative shifted from a near-term dip below 2% with two-sided oil risks to an explicit call that pass-through and crude prices will push fiscal 2026 inflation above 2%, with price risks judged skewed to the upside.
- Labour Market — More hawkish. Prior language was data-dependent and awaited spring wage outcomes, whereas the current document asserts a strong labour shortage is sustaining a self-reinforcing wage-price cycle and lifting medium- to long-term inflation expectations.
- Rate Path — More hawkish. Forward guidance hardened from a conditional hold (with Middle East caution and a single dissent) to an explicit commitment to keep raising rates while deleting the 'in accordance with the degree of improvement in the economy and prices' conditionality, alongside three dissents including a motion for 1.0%.
- Balance Sheet — Little changed. The prior statement's reassurance that systemic financial problems have not emerged has no counterpart in the current document, leaving the balance-sheet framing unchanged.
Key wording
At today's meeting, the Bank decided by a majority vote to maintain the guideline for money market operations, encouraging the uncollateralized overnight call rate to remain at around 0.75 percent.
Member Takata submitted a proposal to raise the policy interest rate to around 1.0 percent, arguing that the price stability target has largely been achieved and that the risk of an upside overshoot in domestic prices is high due to second-round effects of overseas-driven price increases; however, this proposal was rejected by a majority vote.
Looking ahead, as the effects of price increases in food items such as rice wane, and with the effects of the government's measures against high prices, the year-on-year rate of change in the CPI excluding fresh food is expected to first narrow its positive margin to a level below 2 percent, after which the effects of the recent rise in crude oil prices are expected to work in the direction of widening the positive margin.
Given that the current real interest rate is at an extremely low level, if the above economic and price outlook is realized, the Bank considers that it will continue to raise the policy interest rate and adjust the degree of monetary accommodation in response to improvements in economic and price conditions.
That is, if downward pressure is placed on the economy and the output gap deteriorates, that would be a factor pushing down the underlying rate of inflation. On the other hand, if the rise in crude oil prices and yen depreciation lead to rises in people's medium- to long-term inflation expectations, that would work to push up the underlying rate of inflation.
It is also necessary to note that, with firms' wage- and price-setting behavior becoming more proactive, such movements could be stronger than in the past -- for example, compared with the period after the rise in import prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
At today's Monetary Policy Meeting, we decided by majority vote to maintain the guideline for money market operations of encouraging the uncollateralized overnight call rate to remain at around 0.75 percent. Member Nakagawa, while noting uncertainty over the Middle East situation, judged that based on economic conditions, under accommodative financial conditions, the upside risk to prices is high; Member Takata judged that the price stability target has been broadly achieved and that the upside risk to domestic prices from second-round effects of overseas-originated price increases has already heightened; and Member Tamura, as upside risks to prices are expanding significantly, in order to move even slightly closer to the neutral interest rate, proposed a motion to raise the policy interest rate to around 1.0 percent; all three submitted this proposal, but it was rejected by majority vote.
As for the balance of risks, centered on fiscal 2026, downside risks are judged to be larger for the economic outlook, and upside risks are judged to be larger for the price outlook.
Looking ahead, as the pass-through of wage increases to selling prices continues, the rise in crude oil prices will act in the direction of pushing up prices, mainly for energy prices and goods prices, so fiscal 2026 is projected to be in the upper 2 percent range.
As the Bank of Japan, given that the underlying rate of inflation is approaching 2 percent and that the current real interest rate is at an extremely low level, we believe that it will continue to raise the policy interest rate and adjust the degree of monetary accommodation in accordance with economic activity, prices, and financial conditions.
On the price side, although the economic slowdown accompanying the Middle East situation acts in the direction of pushing down the underlying rate of inflation through deterioration in the output gap and other factors, on the whole, upside risks are considered to be larger.
That said, as I mentioned earlier, we are sufficiently aware of the risk that such an increase in headline inflation—to put it collectively—will push up underlying prices, and when assessing that risk, whether inflation expectations, which you mentioned in your second point, are anchored or not—currently, medium- to long-term inflation expectations vary considerably depending on which indicator one looks at, but they are approaching 2 percent, yet in the sense that they have not been moving around at 2 percent for a long time, they are not completely anchored.
Official documents
Background reading
Related
19 March 2026 press conference · 28 April 2026 press conference · Earlier meeting · Later meeting · Previous comparison · Next comparison · Methodology
The Cadence Brief
The one number that moved central bank pricing — delivered each weekday morning.