Norges Bank Minutes comparison — 26 March 2026 vs 7 May 2026

This Norges Bank minutes comparison covers 26 March 2026 and 7 May 2026. Overall, the newer document was more dovish. The May statement delivers the hike signaled in March, but the tone is less alarmed as inflation and labour market developments now match projections. The committee remains on a gradual tightening path, with the next move dependent on incoming data.

What changed

More dovish. The May statement delivers the hike signaled in March, but the tone is less alarmed as inflation and labour market developments now match projections. The committee remains on a gradual tightening path, with the next move dependent on incoming data.

  • Inflation — More dovish. Prior highlighted inflation markedly higher than projected, current says broadly as projected; though still elevated, the surprise element has dissipated.
  • Labour Market — More dovish. Prior noted unemployment slightly lower than projected, current says broadly as expected; the tightness surprise is gone.
  • Rate Path — Little changed. Prior strongly signaled a near-term hike, current delivers a 25bp hike and maintains the same forward guidance for further tightening; no net change in stance.
  • Balance Sheet — Little changed. No balance sheet discussion in either document; no shift.

Key wording

At its meeting on 25 March 2026, the Committee decided to keep the policy rate unchanged at 4%.

rate path: Explicit policy decision: no change at this meeting.

The Committee’s current assessment of the inflation outlook implies that it will likely be appropriate to raise the policy rate at one of the forthcoming monetary policy meetings.

rate path: Signals a near-term rate hike, pushing up front-end expectations.

Inflation has been markedly higher than projected. At the same time, wage growth is projected to be higher this year than projected in December, which will likely restrain disinflation ahead.

inflation: Inflation surprise and sticky wage growth reinforce tightening bias.

Inflation has been markedly higher than projected.

inflation: Inflation overshoot underpins the hawkish shift and expected rate hikes.

Capacity utilisation in the Norwegian economy appears to be holding steady at close to a normal level. Unemployment has been slightly lower than projected in December.

labour market: Tight labour market supports need for further tightening.

If the outlook indicates higher inflation than currently projected, a higher policy rate than currently envisaged may be required. If labour market conditions become weaker than projected or the outlook indicates a faster decline in inflation to target, the policy rate may become lower than currently envisaged.

rate path: Two-sided risk statement; asymmetry tilts hawkish given current inflation overshoot.

At its meeting on 6 May 2026, the Committee decided to raise the policy rate from 4% to 4.25%.

rate path: Rate hike delivered, confirms tightening bias.

The monetary policy outlook does not appear to have changed materially since the monetary policy meeting in March, but there is substantial uncertainty about future economic developments.

rate path: Outlook unchanged but high uncertainty keeps optionality open.

In Norway, inflation has been broadly as projected. Twelve-month CPI inflation rose to 3.6% in March, while CPI inflation adjusted for tax changes and excluding energy products (CPI-ATE) was unchanged at 3%.

inflation: Inflation elevated but as expected; no upside surprise.

Inflation is too high, and there are prospects that inflation will remain elevated ahead. High inflation over time can lead firms and households to plan for persistently high inflation. It may then become more difficult to bring inflation down again.

inflation: Inflation persistence risk flagged; supports further tightening.

Labour market developments have overall been broadly as expected, and capacity utilisation still appears to be close to a normal level.

labour market: Labour market tight but not overheating; consistent with gradual tightening.

The policy rate forecast presented in March indicated an increase in the policy rate to between 4¼% and 4½% by the end of the year. The monetary policy outlook does not appear to have changed materially since that time.

rate path: March path for more hikes remains intact, leaning hawkish.

Official documents

Background reading

Related

Earlier meeting · Later meeting · Previous comparison · Next comparison · Methodology

The Cadence Brief

The one number that moved central bank pricing — delivered each weekday morning.

Free. One email a day. Unsubscribe anytime.