Bank of Japan Press conference comparison — 31 July 2025 vs 19 September 2025
This Bank of Japan press conference comparison covers 31 July 2025 and 19 September 2025. Overall, the newer document was mixed. The current document shows a mild hawkish shift via rate path dissent and balance sheet tightening, but inflation and labour market assessments have softened. The next decision likely hinges on data through early next year, with a hike possible if downside risks do not materialize.
What changed
Mixed. The current document shows a mild hawkish shift via rate path dissent and balance sheet tightening, but inflation and labour market assessments have softened. The next decision likely hinges on data through early next year, with a hike possible if downside risks do not materialize.
- Inflation — More dovish. Current statement stresses that underlying inflation remains below 2% and that food inflation is temporary, a softer tone than prior's conviction that inflation would gradually reach target.
- Labour Market — More dovish. No explicit labour market mention in current statement, a notable omission from prior's emphasis on tight labour market and wage norms.
- Rate Path — More hawkish. Two members dissented for a hike, a more hawkish internal split than prior; however the majority held rates steady citing downside risks.
- Balance Sheet — More hawkish. BOJ decided to begin ETF disposal, a clear hawkish balance sheet move absent in prior document.
Key wording
we decided unanimously to maintain the monetary market operation policy of conducting operations to encourage the uncollateralized overnight call rate to remain at around 0.5%.
the underlying rate of increase in consumer prices is expected to struggle to grow due to the impact of the slowing pace of economic growth.
Regarding the risk balance for the economy, taking into account the influence of trade policies in various countries, we view the downside risks as being larger for fiscal 2025 and 2026, similar to the previous Outlook Report. We view the risk balance for the price outlook as being generally balanced between upside and downside.
given that current real interest rates are at an extremely low level, if the aforementioned economic and price outlooks are realized, we believe that we will continue to raise the policy interest rate and adjust the degree of monetary easing in response to improvements in economic and price conditions.
labor supply and demand continue to be tight, and under these conditions, the movement to pass wage increases through to sales prices is continuing.
As for the outlook, the underlying rate of price increase is expected to struggle to grow for a while due to the impact of the slowing pace of economic growth.
we decided by a majority vote to maintain the existing policy of encouraging the uncollateralized overnight call rate to remain at around 0.5%.
the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index (excluding fresh food) is currently in the upper 2% range, due to the continued pass-through of wage increases to selling prices and the impact of rising food prices such as rice.
Member Takada submitted a proposal to raise the policy interest rate to around 0.75%, arguing that the norm of prices not rising has shifted and that the achievement of the price stability target has been broadly attained. Member Tamura also submitted a proposal to raise the policy rate to around 0.75%, citing the need to move closer to the neutral interest rate amid growing upside risks to prices.
There are various risk factors surrounding this outlook, but in particular, uncertainty regarding future developments in trade policies of various countries and their impact on overseas economic and price developments remains high, and it is necessary to pay close attention to their impact on financial and foreign exchange markets and Japan's economy and prices.
my assessment is that it is still slightly below that, but in the process of approaching 2%.
Therefore, for example, if food inflation declines and short-term household inflation expectations calm down accordingly, that does not necessarily mean it is negative for achieving our price stability target.
Official documents
Background reading
Related
31 July 2025 press conference · 19 September 2025 press conference · Earlier meeting · Later meeting · Previous comparison · Next comparison · Methodology
The Cadence Brief
The one number that moved central bank pricing — delivered each weekday morning.