Federal Reserve Press conference comparison — 29 October 2025 vs 10 December 2025
This Federal Reserve press conference comparison covers 29 October 2025 and 10 December 2025. Overall, the newer document was mixed. The Fed cut rates again but with deep division, emphasizing tariff-driven inflation risks and labor market softening while maintaining a data-dependent stance with no pre-set path. The divided vote and cautious forward guidance suggest a possible hold at the next meeting unless data surprises.
What changed
Mixed. The Fed cut rates again but with deep division, emphasizing tariff-driven inflation risks and labor market softening while maintaining a data-dependent stance with no pre-set path. The divided vote and cautious forward guidance suggest a possible hold at the next meeting unless data surprises.
- Inflation — More hawkish. Current document emphasizes tariff-driven inflation pickup and persistence risk, a more hawkish tone than prior's mix of dovish core readings and cautious monitoring.
- Labour Market — More dovish. Current document highlights rising unemployment and significant downside risks, a more dovish labour market assessment than prior's mixed signals.
- Rate Path — Little changed. Both documents signal caution on further cuts with divided committee; prior explicitly pushed back on December cuts, current shows deep division and no commitment to January.
- Balance Sheet — Little changed. No balance sheet signals in current document; prior signals of ending runoff and freezing size are now in effect, with no new guidance.
Key wording
A further reduction in the policy rate at the December meeting is not a foregone conclusion—far from it. Policy is not on a preset course.
At today’s meeting, the Committee also decided to conclude the reduction of our aggregate securities holdings as of December 1.
a further reduction to the policy rate at the December meeting is not a foregone conclusion
they were strongly differing views
if the two goals are sort of equally at risk, then you ought to be at neutral
the risks are to the upside for inflation and to the downside for employment
The adjustments to our policy stance since September bring it within a range of plausible estimates of neutral and leave us well positioned to determine the extent and timing of additional adjustments to our policy rate based on the incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks.
That new language points out that we’ll carefully evaluate that incoming data. And, also, I would note that having reduced our policy rate by 75 basis points since September and 175 basis points since last September, the fed funds rate is now within a broad range of estimates of its neutral value, and we are well positioned to wait to see how the economy evolves.
And so we decided, as our framework tells us to do, that when the risks to the two goals become more equal, you should move from a stance that favors really dealing with one of them—in that case, inflation—to a more balanced, more neutral setting.
Today’s decision was clearly very divided. It wasn’t just the two official dissents against the cut, but there were also soft dissents from four others.
We made a decision today. We had—you know, 9 out of 12 supported it.
we’re well positioned to wait to see how the economy evolves.
Official documents
Background reading
Related
29 October 2025 press conference · 10 December 2025 press conference · Earlier meeting · Later meeting · Previous comparison · Next comparison · Methodology
The Cadence Brief
The one number that moved central bank pricing — delivered each weekday morning.